PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ARB vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ARB and ^GSPC is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

ARB vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.27%
9.36%
ARB
^GSPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ARB:

1.65

^GSPC:

1.81

Sortino Ratio

ARB:

2.29

^GSPC:

2.43

Omega Ratio

ARB:

1.32

^GSPC:

1.33

Calmar Ratio

ARB:

2.61

^GSPC:

2.77

Martin Ratio

ARB:

6.26

^GSPC:

11.33

Ulcer Index

ARB:

0.89%

^GSPC:

2.07%

Daily Std Dev

ARB:

3.38%

^GSPC:

12.97%

Max Drawdown

ARB:

-5.60%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

ARB:

-0.02%

^GSPC:

-1.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARB achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 2.68% return.


ARB

YTD

1.43%

1M

1.56%

6M

3.26%

1Y

5.76%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

2.68%

1M

2.24%

6M

9.36%

1Y

22.63%

5Y*

13.42%

10Y*

11.74%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ARB vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARB is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARB is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARB is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARB is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARB is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARB is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ARB vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ARB, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.651.81
The chart of Sortino ratio for ARB, currently valued at 2.29, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.292.43
The chart of Omega ratio for ARB, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.321.33
The chart of Calmar ratio for ARB, currently valued at 2.61, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.612.77
The chart of Martin ratio for ARB, currently valued at 6.26, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.2611.33
ARB
^GSPC

The current ARB Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARB and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.65
1.81
ARB
^GSPC

Drawdowns

ARB vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARB drawdown since its inception was -5.60%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARB and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.02%
-1.30%
ARB
^GSPC

Volatility

ARB vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AltShares Merger Arbitrage ETF (ARB) is 0.86%, while S&P 500 (^GSPC) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that ARB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.86%
4.26%
ARB
^GSPC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab